Current:Home > InvestScientists say they've confirmed fossilized human footprints found in New Mexico are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old -Ascend Wealth Education
Scientists say they've confirmed fossilized human footprints found in New Mexico are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old
View
Date:2025-04-16 03:26:30
Scientists have confirmed that fossilized footprints found in New Mexico are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old — meaning humans existed in North America much earlier than previously believed.
The originally study about the footprints, discovered embedded in the ground of White Sands National Park in New Mexico, was published in September 2021, sparking conversations, with some questioning the accuracy of the findings.
It was believed humans existed in North America somewhere between 13,500 and 16,000 years ago. So, were the prints — some of which look distinctly human with five toes — really between 21,000 and 23,000 years old?
Researchers from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and other scientist decided to do a follow-up study, using two new approaches to determine the age of the prints.
"The immediate reaction in some circles of the archeological community was that the accuracy of our dating was insufficient to make the extraordinary claim that humans were present in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum," said co-author of the new study, Jeff Pigati, a USGS research geologist. "But our targeted methodology in this current research really paid off,"
The scientists initially used seeds from the Ruppia cirrhosa plant found in the fossils. They used radiocarbon dating to determine the age of the seeds, but because the plants are aquatic and can hold carbon from the water instead of the air, the age estimate could have been off.
So, in the new study, they used radiocarbon dating on conifer pollen, which comes from plants on earth, that were found in the same layers as the seeds. "Even as the original work was being published, we were forging ahead to test our results with multiple lines of evidence," said co-author Kathleen Springer, a USGS research geologist. "We were confident in our original ages, as well as the strong geologic, hydrologic, and stratigraphic evidence, but we knew that independent chronologic control was critical."
The researchers had to isolate a whopping 75,000 pollen grains from the same layer and found that their age was statistically identical to the Ruppia cirrhosa seeds.
To further check their dating, they also tested quartz grains found in the footprints using a different dating process, optically stimulated luminescence. They found the quartz had a minimum age of about 21,500 years.
USGS says with three corroborating pieces of evidence, it is unlikely the age range of 21,000 to 23,000 years is incorrect.
Footprints have been found at White Sands before, according to the National Park Service. After first finding footprints in a lakebed in 2006, scientists later dug them up and found both human and sloth footprints. They later found direwolf prints and dated those 18,000 years by using ancient seeds found nearby. They also found footprints of a female and a toddler in 2018.
In 2018, researchers discovered what they believe to be footprints of a female. They tell a story that may seem familiar today; her footprints show her walking for almost a mile, with a toddler's footprints occasionally showing up beside hers. Evidence suggests that she carried the child, shifting them from side to side and occasionally setting the child down as they walked. The footprints broadened and slipped in the mud as a result of the additional weight she was carrying.
The 2021 study found the footprints mainly belong to teens and children, which may be due to a division of labor, with teens performing "fetching and carrying tasks" and children accompanying them.
Caitlin O'KaneCaitlin O'Kane is a digital content producer covering trending stories for CBS News and its good news brand, The Uplift.
veryGood! (9356)
Related
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- From Zendaya to Simone Biles, 14 quotes from young icons to kick off Black History Month
- U.S. beefing up air defenses at base in Jordan where 3 soldiers were killed in drone attack
- Super Bowl 58: Vegas entertainment from Adele and Zach Bryan to Gronk and Shaq parties
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Parents of OnlyFans model charged with murder arrested on evidence-tampering charges: Report
- U.S. beefing up air defenses at base in Jordan where 3 soldiers were killed in drone attack
- Dead & Company join the queue for Las Vegas residency at The Sphere
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- These Secrets About Harry Styles Will Have You Late Night Talking
Ranking
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- NBA stars serious about joining US men's basketball team for 2024 Paris Olympics
- Kanye West and Travis Scott Reunite for Surprise Performance of “Runaway”
- Amelia Earhart's plane may have been found. Why are we obsessed with unsolved mysteries?
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Dead & Company join the queue for Las Vegas residency at The Sphere
- Stock market today: Wall Street drops to worst loss in months with Big Tech, hope for March rate cut
- Premature birth rate rose 12% since 2014, the CDC reports. A doctor shares what to know.
Recommendation
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Former Trump official injured, another man dead amid spike in D.C. area carjackings
'The View' co-hosts clap back at men who criticize Taylor Swift's NFL game appearances
U.K. mulls recognizing a Palestinian state to advance two-state solution, defuse Israel-Hamas war
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
OnlyFans Model Courtney Clenney’s Parents Arrested in Connection With Evidence Tampering in Murder Case
Songs by Taylor Swift, Drake and more are starting to disappear from TikTok. Here’s why
A beheading video was on YouTube for hours, raising questions about why it wasn’t taken down sooner